Process documents & email
Pre-sort inboxes, classify content, extract relevant details from invoices or forms and assign them to the right case.
- Document processing
- Data extraction
We build controlled AI automation for documents, email and recurring workflows. AI organises and prepares; clear rules bound the workflow, while people decide exceptions.

Good candidates are frequent workflows with variable content and a result that can be reviewed by the responsible team.
Pre-sort inboxes, classify content, extract relevant details from invoices or forms and assign them to the right case.
Summarise information, pre-check criteria and prepare a reasoned suggestion. Missing or uncertain values remain visible.
Internal assistants use approved company context for clearly bounded tasks. Authorised APIs pass confirmed results to existing software.
The technical solution follows the nature of the decision. AI does not become an end in itself, and conventional logic is not made needlessly complex.
When conditions are stable and can be expressed completely, conventional automation is usually the simpler and more traceable solution.
Required fields · Thresholds · Status changesWhen language, documents or wording vary, AI can recognise and organise content and prepare a reviewable suggestion.
Extraction · Classification · DraftingAmbiguous, consequential or rare cases remain with a responsible person, with the necessary preparation available in one place.
Exception · Approval · EscalationAn operational workflow must work with real cases, edge cases and clear accountability – not just in a convincing demo.
Assess volume, handling time, failures and genuine decisions.
Review sources, quality, permissions and sensitive content.
Evaluate typical cases, edge cases and necessary approvals.
Put integrations, logging, fallbacks and ongoing monitoring in place.
Sometimes a fixed rule, a better interface or a dependable integration is enough. We assess the benefit first and choose the technology second.
A similar case recurs frequently, enough representative examples are available and the result can be reviewed by the responsible team. People can assess corrections and exceptions.
The goal, current workflow or data basis remains unclear, a consequential decision is meant to run without visible review, or no one owns operation and quality.
Good candidates are frequent workflows with variable content and a reviewable result, such as classifying email, capturing document data or preparing recurring checks. Rare, unclear or unreviewable decisions are usually a poor starting point.
When all conditions can be expressed clearly and the input data is structured. Fixed rules are then often simpler and easier to trace. Conventional logic can provide the dependable frame while AI handles only the variable part.
Often, yes – provided suitable APIs, imports or controlled handovers are available. We review access early and plan how statuses, failures and corrections flow back into the current workflow.
Before choosing a model, we clarify data types, purpose, permissions, necessary storage and potential providers. Data minimisation, separate access controls and logging are planned for the specific use case. A blanket privacy promise without this review would not be responsible.
This requires a narrow use case, representative examples, a reviewable target and the necessary system access. A pilot should deliberately cover one coherent workflow and use real cases to show whether quality and operational value are sufficient.
Show us one recurring workflow and a few typical cases. We will assess which parts can be handled effectively with rules, AI or better system integration.