Pre-sort email and documents.
Classify requests, extract details from invoices or forms and assign them to the right case.
- Document processing
- Data extraction
We build workflows that classify email and documents, extract information and prepare checks. Fixed rules determine what may continue automatically; uncertain or consequential cases remain visible and require approval by a responsible person.

It is useful where content varies but the result can still be reviewed by the responsible team.
Classify requests, extract details from invoices or forms and assign them to the right case.
Pre-check criteria, summarise information and keep missing or uncertain values visible.
Approved content supports clearly bounded questions. Only confirmed results are passed to existing software through authorised APIs.
Fixed rules handle unambiguous conditions. AI processes variable content. Responsible people decide when context or consequences matter.
When conditions are stable and can be expressed completely, conventional automation is the simpler and more traceable solution.
Examples: Required fields · Thresholds · Status changesWhen language, documents or wording vary, AI can recognise and organise content and prepare a reviewable suggestion.
Examples: Extraction · Classification · DraftingAmbiguous, consequential or rare cases remain with a responsible person, with the necessary preparation available in one place.
Examples: Exception · Approval · EscalationWe limit the first pilot to one coherent workflow and test typical cases, edge cases, permissions and approvals. Integration follows only when quality, failure handling and operation are traceable.
See our development processSometimes a fixed rule, a better interface or a dependable integration is the better solution. We therefore assess the benefit first and choose the technology second.
The case recurs frequently, representative examples are available and the result can be reviewed by the responsible team. A named person can assess exceptions and corrections.
The goal, data basis or ownership is unclear – or a consequential decision is meant to run without visible review. In that case, we first clarify the workflow or use a fixed rule or better integration.
A free project description is structured into a category, a possible initial scope, open questions and risks. The result follows a validated format; if the model connection is unavailable, a limited rules-based assessment remains available. Contact details are sent only after a separate confirmation.
Often, yes – provided suitable APIs, imports or controlled handovers are available. We review access early and plan how statuses, failures and corrections flow back into the current workflow.
Before choosing a model, we clarify which data may be processed, why it is needed, who may access it and how long it is retained. Data minimisation, permissions and logging are defined for the specific workflow.
We define in advance when a case may continue automatically and when it must be flagged, set aside or sent to a responsible person for approval. The handling of exceptions remains traceable.
A narrowly bounded workflow, representative examples, a reviewable target and the necessary system access. Real cases must show whether quality and operational value are sufficient.
Tell us about one recurring case, the systems involved and typical exceptions. We will assess what can be supported effectively with rules, AI or better integration.